|
?However much you strut about
outside,/ Get home and the wife will take your hide./ In
the home, Mian?s a zero,/ Bibi?s the real hero.?
[Baire jatoi karo na phutani,/
Ghare-te elei bibi-r dhantani./ Barite Mian zero,/ Bibi-i
ashole hero.]
? MLA Phatakeshto
Everyone loves the funny politician,
all bluster among his followers and henpecked in the house.
But the bogey wife is funnier, reduced by the humorous male
voice, and stuck firmly at home. Who are the women being
ridiculed here, ever so gently?
It could not be Nayana Bandyopadhyay.
Far from the nagging shrew, she is the perfect supportive
helpmeet. Her position is unique: she is the sitting MLA
(who won on a Trinamool ticket) of the same constituency
from which her husband, Sudip Bandyopadhyay, is running
as Congress candidate this time. As a campaigner for her
husband, she asks her electorate to vote for him.
In our pick of the wives of candidates
and campaign leaders, and of women workers, she is an MLA
herself. So political shifts do not bother her. She has
been inspired in her change by Sonia Gandhi?s sacrifices.
In place of Didi (Mamata Banerjee), Pranabda and
Somenda are now there to guide her.
But Nayana has to balance her
acting with her own political career and that of her husband.
Today she is the candidate?s ideal wife. Visiting party
workers constantly need tea, and she orders out if there
is a crowd. That?s a change from her mother-in-law?s days:
Nayana remembers her making handis of tea. Now she
gives Sudip tea, toast and fruits for breakfast; makes sure
he is carrying water, towels and a change of clothes on
the campaign trail, and has half a cup of rice and fish
ready for lunch, soup and sandwiches for dinner. This is
as pretty as a picture, ready to be filmed.
But voices can be different. That
of the mother of Firhad Hakim, Trinamool councillor, Ward
82, is distinctly so. She was unenthusiastic at first about
her son?s political activism, but supports him now. Yet,
she voted left as long as Mani Sanyal was alive despite
her son?s leanings. That choice was her own.
the way it runs
Choices are of different kinds,
like households. Sati Chatterjee, wife of Salil Chatterjee,
CPI(M) candidate from Cossipore, said: ?The way this house
runs could be a little different from other houses. That
is because my husband has been active in politics for over
two decades. [He was the councillor of Ward 7 from 1985
to 2005 and has also been borough chairman.] So the house
is always full of people, who drop in at all times. I have
to address their queries besides running the house.? It
is just a little more hectic during election time. Looking
after her husband?s health, ensuring that he has his medicines
and noon-jal, is one of her extra jobs then. Sati
may not be an MLA, but she has been a member of the local
CPI(M) Mahila Samiti for 20 years: ?I am not known simply
as Salil Chatterjee?s wife, and I enjoy my role. A lot of
people who come here actually come to meet me rather than
my husband.?
Would she have acquired this identity
had she married into a non-political family? Maybe the answer
is to be found in the way she recalls her marriage: ?I was
married [in 1971] into a household that was active politically.
The situation was very new to me. For days I would not see
my husband. He was living outside Calcutta, his life under
threat. My father-in-law would smuggle me out of the house
to meet him in the weekends.?
Sati has her daughter-in-law,
Maulisri, looking up to her. For this young lecturer, too,
marrying into a political family has been illuminating.
She is more aware now of the problems of people in the slums,
for example, and admires her mother-in-law?s efforts to
help them.
Mutual admiration among these
artists of identity circulates within the home. Hakim?s
mother admires her daughter-in-law, Ruby, whose adaptability
has made her son?s career possible.
Ruby Hakim, too, campaigns when
her husband is a candidate. This time, when he campaigned
for his party, she would have to stay awake late, discussing
perhaps an error in a leaflet with her worried partner.
He is always busy, but during campaigns he is out of the
house by 6.30 in the morning and not back before midnight.
She runs the house, looks after her children and in-laws,
and helps in her husband?s business.
The councillor?s wife is a ?medium?
between him and the people, taking phone calls, directing
the ?boys? to get the occasional ambulance, ensuring that
her husband signs the right papers when a widow?s allowance
falls due. While talking, she runs upstairs several times,
calls out instructions, answers her children, directs the
driver, gives money to men going in and out, talks business
with an employee, gets ready to take her 15-year-old for
tuition and go to office because it is pay day. Hakim returns
with a string of men before she leaves. Ruby arranges for
their refreshments, jokes with her husband, instructs her
baby to eat properly, scolds a maid mildly for breaking
a tumbler, then picks up her bag to get going.
There is an intriguing sameness
in the stories. Jhuma Ghosh, wife of Atin Ghosh, the Trinamool
candidate from Baranagar, often hops over to the election
office from her Nalin Sarkar Street home to see if the workers
have eaten or if allotted money has been correctly utilized.
She runs the house and looks after her teenage daughter
and sometimes their business. These women may be the real
heroes, but not quite Phatakeshto?s type.
The boudi is ?placed? by
the address, her political role erased by her social one.
Loora Sarkar, whose husband is Subhankar Sarkar, former
state chief of the Chhatra Parishad and secretary of the
state Congress committee, says that politicians? wives are
their best friends, sometimes doing their most confidential
jobs, and also their worst critics.
In this world of strangely wrought
equalities, support is taken for granted. No one complains
about extra work. And there is no point, Loora says, in
cribbing about the lack of privacy. For unlike the gentleman,
whose home is his castle, the politician?s home is his office.
Even the most glamorous boudi of them all, Nayana, was shocked
to find strangers in her bedroom soon after marriage.
Politicians, says Loora, cannot
and do not spend time with their families. She, too, copes
with child, home, and work, and with endless telephone calls
meant for her husband. Family holidays, even honeymoons,
just do not happen. Ranjini, the wife of Partha Pratim Biswas,
CPI(M) candidate from Tollygunge, is happy with her little
daughter and her music. She feels, as do Sati and Ruby and
Loora, that her husband is just busier than usual at election
time. She has to field more phone calls, and he can spend
even less time at home.
If there are conditions to this
support, they are not visible. Or audible. In this new game
of Family Values, the realities of power and violence, the
nuances of ideology have nothing to do with the achievements
of the favourite boy. The recognition of realities is replaced
by a faith in ?doing good?. Confusing social work with politics
is a reassuring exercise. Ruby, for example, does not mind
being ?sucked into? her husband?s passion for politics,
because Firhad genuinely loves helping people. It is a belief
? in partners, sons, fathers ? echoed by the others. Jhuma?s
mother-in-law accompanies her to election offices as does
her sister-in-law. Ranjini?s mother is proud of her jamai,
and her mother-in-law too has faith.
Family loyalty is easily the winner
over freedom of choice.
Home and the world
Social good is the key to the
commitment of women party workers as well. Women workers
are displayed by all parties as a measure of their political
correctness. They work devotedly, their partymen
say, moving from door to door in between their household
chores, mobilizing their ?friends? for processions and meetings,
distributing voters? lists, without stipends or other benefits.
Badal Bhattacharya, the chief election agent for Somen Mitra,
Congress MLA from Sealdah, feels they are more committed
than men. The women in the office of Khalid Ebadullah, the
Congress candidate from Entally, were only too eager to
talk about their commitment and the support they get from
their families. The men all around watched them keenly.
They seemed to exert a concerted will to end the chat as
soon as possible.
To go by the men, the lives of
candidates and their colleagues are models of harmony, both
in and out of home. Badal Bhattacharya says his wife, Bani,
knows the demands of a political household well, having
married him in 1969, when he was the Chhatra Parishad general
secretary. His home is forever open to party workers and
that makes Bani ?happy?. Ebadullah, whose wife we could
not meet because his family had to ?fly? somewhere on business,
said, ?I am speaking for them.? They are very happy, he
said, they have no problems.
Invisible hierarchies, like glass
walls, divide the world of women workers. The headquarters
of the Trinamool Congress, which is said to have 30 to 35
per cent of female worker participation, and the highest
percentage of women candidates, was a male bastion at 10
in the morning a week before Calcutta went to the polls.
Men wandered around either freshly bathed or in their nightclothes,
talking on their mobiles and casting sidelong glances at
the female intruder waiting to ask them questions. She sensed
they were wondering how best to shoo her away. She was sent
away to Kakali Ghosh Dastidar, West Bengal Trinamool Mahila
Congress president, who would answer all her questions.
Not all walls can be seen.
A different class
It is gruelling work on the streets.
Female foot-soldiers across parties are all from the lower
or lower middle-classes. Chandrima Bhattacharya, West Bengal
Mahila Congress president, who says that 7,000 to 8,000
women have worked for the assembly elections, claims that
the ratio of participation of women to that of men is equal
at the basic level. There is no difference in the work.
Female participation is greater in villages, although literacy
levels there are lower. Is that an argument for reservations?
But what about rising out of the
ranks? Jayanti Banerjee of the Pashchim Banga Ganatantrik
Mahila Samiti and member of the Calcutta district committee
of the CPI(M) admits that the foot soldier can at most become
a leader at the primary level. Poorer women are limited
by their inexperience. Leadership and organization are given
to middle-class women.
The hierarchy of values within
the home matches the hierarchy of gender and class outside
it. Harmony is kept in place by internal ? and internalized
? forms of control. In the office of Mita Mitra, Trinamool
councillor of Ward 74 in Chetla, who campaigned for Tapas
Pal, Swadesh, her husband, tells the women workers in a
low voice, ?Speak carefully (Shabdhane katha bolbe).?
According to Kakali, the Trinamool
Congress has 10 workers per polling booth. But not one party
can show off a female chief election agent. Badal Bhattacharya
says it is too hectic a job. Women are comparatively less
educated, say the women leaders, and they lack skills to
manage a booth. (Or is it violence?) Besides, household
duties clash with the sleepless hours of an election agent?s
job. Most often, male leaders decide what the women will
do. But chauvinism alone is not at fault, says Chandrima.
There is a social history to take into account: ?Women like
to lag behind (Meyera pichhiye thakte bhalobashe).?
Even Sati Chatterjee, apparently:
?The responsibilities of a leader or an MLA are very different
from that of an ordinary worker. I don?t think I have the
time or the resources, or even the confidence, for such
roles. I straddle two worlds, the private and the public,
and I wouldn?t like to sacrifice either.?
Sushama Singh or Maya Dey, Trinamool
workers under Mita Mitra, straddle two worlds too. Sushama,
whose husband is an auto driver, wakes up at 3 am to collect
water. She does the housework, gets her children ready for
school, comes to the party office at 10. At 12.30, she goes
home and cooks lunch, is back in the office by 5, and goes
home four or five hours later. Neither she nor Maya thinks
of contesting elections. They are proud to be close to Mamata
and Mita, and happy to be of use. They look to their didis
to address their problems.
Freedom is made of many colours.
Of what are choices made? |