TT Epaper LHS
The Telegraph
TT Mobile
 
 
IN TODAY'S PAPER
WEEKLY FEATURES
CITY NEWSLINES
FEEDS
  RSS
  My Yahoo!
SEARCH
 
Archives Web
 
ARCHIVES
Since 1st March, 1999
 
THE TELEGRAPH
 
CIMA Gallary
 
Email This Page
SEIZE THE FIRE

When a war goes beyond victory or defeat it becomes a ceasefire — the making, and breaking, of yet another set of vague rules. Israel and Hizbollah are each determined now to convince its people that it has won the five-week war in Lebanon. And this has led to two distinct kinds of radical instability in the two countries. In Lebanon, after firing what the world hopes is their last great salvo of rockets, Hizbollah guerrillas are now busy ‘reconstructing’ the ravaged lives of around 900,000 displaced Lebanese civilians. Allegedly funded by Iran, they are promising to provide a year’s rent and a set of new furniture for every family whose house has been destroyed. Sharing with Hamas this ability to switch between violent resistance and social service, Hizbollah is reaping considerable rewards. A substantial section of the Arab world, together with a growing number at home, believes that Hizbollah has pulled off a gloriously unprecedented and strategic victory over Israel and its mighty supporters. Compared to this glory, both the official Lebanese army and the international peace-keeping troops (slowly and uncertainly moving in) are bound to look rather minor and ineffectual. More importantly, Hizbollah’s local upper-hand, gained through an aggressively military ‘victory’, entitles it to pre-empt any talk of disarmament. France, finding itself having to lead the peace-keepers, is already hedging away from taking on this responsibility. The United Nations resolution is also predictably vague about by whom, how, or whether at all, Hizbollah is going to be disarmed.

Israel, on the other hand — rather, Mr Ehud Olmert’s Israel — will now have to prove its might all over again, after being shown up as retreating “cowards” by those dangerous men across its northern borders. A majority of ordinary Israelis, together with many in the military and the left, believes that Mr Olmert and his men should quit. This has effectively driven Israeli politics to the right, and the biggest casualty of this development will be Mr Ariel Sharon’s roadmap for unilateral “realignment” in the West Bank. The whole idea of a negotiated withdrawal from Gaza and the West Bank has begun to sound ridiculously passé in the light of what has happened in Lebanon. Perhaps the only way to salvage Israel’s military reputation now is by “creating victories” on the Palestinian front, as an Israeli army chief puts it. Peace would be the last thing to come out of such creations.

Top
Email This Page