TT Epaper LHS
The Telegraph
TT Mobile
 
 
IN TODAY'S PAPER
WEEKLY FEATURES
CITY NEWSLINES
FEEDS
  RSS
  My Yahoo!
SEARCH
 
Archives Web
 
ARCHIVES
Since 1st March, 1999
 
THE TELEGRAPH
 
CIMA Gallary
 
Email This Page
Delhi fires Bush Brahmastra

Washington, June 28: Indian negotiators on the nuclear deal have put the Americans on the mat by pointing out that their President, George W. Bush, has promised reprocessing rights to India and said so in public.

India’s new negotiating strategy on the so-called 123 Agreement to operationalise the nuclear deal is, therefore, to treat the issue of reprocessing spent fuel produced by any American reactors imported by India as an issue which has already been settled.

Reprocessing rights for India has been one of the stumbling blocks in concluding the 123 Agreement even after several rounds of talks between the two sides for 15 months.

India’s negotiators on the 123 Agreement, S. Jaishankar and Raminder Singh Jassal, met their American interlocutor, Richard J.K. Stratford, for a round of unannounced talks here on Tuesday.

The absence of agreement on reprocessing during talks between diplomats and technical experts on both sides has now forced New Delhi to use its Brahmastra, which is Bush’s commitment on reprocessing.

At his joint news conference with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi’s Hyderabad House on March 2, 2006, Bush acknowledged that he had advocated reprocessing rights for India.

“I proposed reprocessing agreements — that stands in stark contrast to current nuclear theology that we should not reprocess for proliferation concerns,” Bush said in answer to a question on why India was being rewarded for its “bad behaviour” in not signing the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

“I don’t see how you can advocate nuclear power, in order to take the pressure off of our own economy, for example, without advocating technological development of reprocessing, because reprocessing will not only — reprocessing is going to help with the environmental concerns with nuclear power. It will make there — to put it bluntly, there will be less material to dispose.”

He added: “And so I am trying to think differently, not to stay stuck in the past, and recognise that by thinking differently, particularly on nuclear power, we can achieve some important objectives, one of which is less reliance on fossil fuels; second is to work with our partners to help both our economies grow; and thirdly is to be strong on dealing with the proliferation issues.”

India’s new line in the 123 negotiations may have been behind US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice’s assertion yesterday at the annual meeting of the US-India Business Council that the nuclear deal will be done only by the end of this year.

The implication of her statement was that completion of the next stage in the nuclear deal required a meeting between the US President and the Indian Prime Minister, which is now expected to take place here in August or September.

Speaking at a panel discussion immediately after Rice’s speech, Sanjaya Baru, media adviser to the Prime Minister, said a political decision has been made at the highest level in the Indian and US governments to see through the nuclear deal.

Completion of the 123 negotiations depends on Washington, he noted, implying that the US has to fulfil the commitments it made, including Bush’s commitment on reprocessing.The nuclear deal, he said, is more an issue of trust between the two governments than anything else.

Ashley Tellis, a strategic expert who was part of the US team which went to New Delhi recently for the 123 talks, said the nitty-gritty of the negotiations should be completed in the next few weeks.

Top
Email This Page

 More stories in Front Page

  • Wind blows for fighter girls
  • Play and politics never too far
  • TV serial
  • Court push to CAS rollout
  • 'Scared' Zahira gives in
  • 9 killed in Tezpur accident
  • Rooney seals record ?5m book deal
  • Pope Priya to judge the Code
  • Quota on PM plate
  • Caution cancels IAS exam
  • Gogoi meets Singh
  • Change proves hard for CPM
  • Trust won, Delhi ring for berth bout
  • Capital of chaos at mob mercy
  • Coup claims king's seal
  • Hizb offers festival truce
  • Enter, Lucy's big sis
  • Protest put off after Koda promise
  • Tax target worry for Naveen govt
  • Last-minute pullout cloud on Games
  • Maidan lost, govt goes by the book
  • Jinnah House for Saarc, not Pak
  • Tanker strike off
  • Guess who wants Sourav to open in World Cup
  • Accident sparks attack on steel plant
  • Police foil rebel attack on station
  • Fasting women moved to GMCH
  • 2 Ulfa rebels killed in encounter
  • Delhi, Dhaka step into enclaves
  • IIM seat hike on hold
  • CPM counts Nandigram losses
  • A mouche to impress Mush
  • Gulistan lost and found in part
  • Mittal nod to Chiriya mine
  • Trip down the primrose path
  • Killings probe on last lap
  • Double hole in Q dossier
  • Once-in-a-while blue moon
  • Patil but Pratibha
  • Red trap nets 12 jawans, again
  • Polling ends in peace amid tight security
  • Villages score over city
  • Rape slur on Bihar jawan
  • IT meet begins today
  • Plugged in to charge, mobile explodes
  • KICK DE, INDIA
  • Sabitri in love, get out of way
  • Mango threat to Delhi mission
  • Sting operation awaits scrutiny
  • Rio fans affiliation flames
  • Mamoni suffers stroke
  • Land for land policy on table
  • Pervez Arabian wish
  • Hey Ram! God save the govt
  • Run over, techie lies on road as pilot van stops and speeds off
  • Wish to talk in protesters' bin
  • 3 engineers in rebel custody
  • Snubbed CID acts pricey
  • Katrina wind in Jindal sails
  • Scan on track for murder