TT Epaper LHS
The Telegraph
TT Mobile
 
 
IN TODAY'S PAPER
WEEKLY FEATURES
CITY NEWSLINES
FEEDS
  RSS
  My Yahoo!
SEARCH
 
Archives Web
 
ARCHIVES
Since 1st March, 1999
 
THE TELEGRAPH
 
CIMA Gallary
 
Email This Page
Pre-payment case
Scanner on loan fee

New Delhi, Sept. 17 (PTI): The Supreme Court will rule whether banks can charge a pre-payment fee from customers who decide to repay loans to save on interest.

The court is hearing an appeal filed by the State Bank of India against the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission’s order that said such levies were unfair and restrictive.

The commission had also said consumers’ right to avail themselves of loans at a lesser interest rate could not be curtailed by such pre-payment clauses.

A bench headed by Justice B.N. Agarwal today sought within four weeks a reply from Usha Vaid, on whose petition the commission had passed the order.

Additional solicitor-general Mohan Parasaran and Sanjiv Kapur, who appeared for the bank, said charging pre-payment fee was a normal banking practice and consumer forums could not alter contracts.

The lawyers said the state-run bank was the custodian of public money and could not allow its funds to sink.

“Pre-payment charges/premium are designed to protect a lender against potential losses it may incur if a loan is paid earlier than it is contracted for. The enforceability of pre-payment charges is critical for lenders,” SBI said.

According to the bank, the complainant could not say it had acted in an arbitrary manner when the loan agreement she signed clearly said that a pre-payment charge of 2 per cent of the amount pre-paid would be levied when the loan is closed.

The bank said Vaid, who was granted a housing loan of Rs 24.50 lakh at a floating rate of interest, had shifted her loan from Tata Housing Finance to Standard Chartered Bank to SBI to ICICI bank. The case, it added, was not one where consumers’ right to take loan at a lower rate of interest had been curtailed.

The complainant had approached the district consumer forum, which ordered refund of the pre-payment charges with interest. The order was confirmed by both the state and the national commissions.

Top
Email This Page

 More stories in Nation

  • CBI probe into picnic death
  • Cruise claims school kids
  • Sack race at Kalam door
  • Pak nudge for joint probe
  • Security alert
  • Bus rolls, despite bombs
  • Count over, search begins for lost kin
  • Boy gives up, 'miracle baby' battles on
  • Curbs on angioplasty without bypass back-up
  • DRDO looks to Kalam boost
  • Cauvery unity at Tamil Nadu meet
  • Heads begin to roll
  • Test for N-deal strategy
  • Port bomb scare in Chennai
  • Terror victims that BJP forgot
 
 
 
Biz2Credit Bizsense